🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHas anyone dealt with janoshik vs in-house testing? Page 4

Has anyone dealt with janoshik vs in-house testing?

Dr.AddMedPHL Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 10:18 PM 29 replies 1,689 viewsPage 4 of 6
anna.melb_AU
Member
678
2,890
Apr 2024
Melbourne, AU
Jun 9, 2025 at 10:05 AM#16

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 5 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 97.8% to 99.6%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

Last edited: Jun 9, 2025 at 2:05 PM
16 14DerekSJ_a1c, paige_pharma, emma_london and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
RetaRick_CA
VIP Member
2,012
9,876
Jan 2024
California
Jun 9, 2025 at 4:22 PM#17
Dr.GutHealth said:
Reconstituted peptide stability data for certificates of analysis: I had Janoshik test my reconstituted vial at day 1, day 14, and day 28 stored in…

Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight. This confirms identity — not just purity.

Why this matters: HPLC can show you a "pure" compound, but if it's pure of the WRONG compound, purity is meaningless. Mass spec at m/z 4113.58 Da confirms it's actually semaglutide. My Janoshik report includes both HPLC and mass spec.

If your testing provider only offers HPLC, consider upgrading to include mass spec for at least your first batch from a new vendor.

Last edited: Jun 9, 2025 at 5:22 PM
17 15AmyNC_wife, SkepticalSean, Dr.CardioMD and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
labquiet_amy
Senior Member
1,234
6,789
Mar 2024
Cambridge, MA
Jun 9, 2025 at 10:39 PM#18
Dr.GutHealth said:
Reconstituted peptide stability data for certificates of analysis: I had Janoshik test my reconstituted vial at day 1, day 14, and day 28 stored in…

I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 99.2% purity. That's within acceptable range for compounded peptides. Turnaround was 12 business days.

The test costs ~$125 but gives you actual HPLC chromatography data plus mass spec confirmation. For the peace of mind alone, it's worth every penny. I test every new batch from a new vendor.

18 16LibrarianMeg, bri_stats, pete_manc_UK and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
oliver_london
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
London, UK
Jun 10, 2025 at 4:55 AM#19

Following on from Dr.GutHealth — and this may be the naive question:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

Last edited: Jun 10, 2025 at 5:55 AM
19 17jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Jun 10, 2025 at 11:11 AM#20

Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful.

41 14PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register