The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

Following on from paige_pharma — and this may be the naive question:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

dan_philly said:

If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.

dan_philly said:

If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.

dan_philly said:

If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.