julia.endo said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
julia.endo said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
zoe_NC said:That holds where the measurement is reliable.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
julia.endo said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
I read this differently from julia.endo, on substance rather than tone. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.