🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingResidual solvent testing on COAs — anyone have experience?

Residual solvent testing on COAs — anyone have experience?

AussieAnna Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 6:07 PM 6 replies 1,478 viewsPage 1 of 2
This thread is more than 14 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
AussieAnna
Member
678
2,890
Jun 2024
Sydney, AU
Mar 26, 2025 at 6:07 PM#1

Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

What I actually want to know is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

I would rather have one careful answer than five confident ones.

47 17TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.MetabolicMD
VIP Member
2,345
16,789
Jan 2024
Rochester, MN
Mar 26, 2025 at 6:52 PM#2

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

Last edited: Mar 26, 2025 at 8:52 PM
46 16PedsEndoPhilly, SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
jennifer_SEA
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Seattle, WA
Mar 26, 2025 at 7:37 PM#3
Dr.MetabolicMD said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

Last edited: Mar 27, 2025 at 1:37 AM
45 15matt_MKE, Dr.ReproEndo, lucas_SP_BR and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
nancy_portland
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Portland, ME
Mar 26, 2025 at 8:22 PM#4
AussieAnna said:
Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

Can confirm the pattern AussieAnna describes. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

44 14Dr.PeteFamMed, claudia_zurich, nancy_portland and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PainCLE
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Cleveland, OH
Mar 27, 2025 at 12:38 AM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 4 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 98.5% to 100.5%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

Last edited: Mar 27, 2025 at 3:38 AM
43 13amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register