🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingCOA database project — my results so far Page 3

COA database project — my results so far

nick_SD_fit Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 6:08 AM 13 replies 2,095 viewsPage 3 of 3
DeniseRN_TPA
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Tampa, FL
Jun 29, 2024 at 2:38 AM#11
Dr.EM_Chicago said:
The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.

That reframing is the part I needed. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

40 13jim_asheville, matt_MKE, Dr.ReproEndo and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.Martinez
Medical Advisor
3,891
28,456
Nov 2023
Boston, MA
Online
Jul 1, 2024 at 5:01 PM#12

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.5% purity, 0.3% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

41 14traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.BariatricHTX
Senior Member
1,456
7,234
Feb 2024
Houston, TX
Jul 4, 2024 at 7:23 AM#13
Dr.LipidDallas said:
My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed: Main peak retention time:…

I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 98.1% purity. That's within acceptable range for compounded peptides. Turnaround was 14 business days.

The test costs ~$130 but gives you actual HPLC chromatography data plus mass spec confirmation. For the peace of mind alone, it's worth every penny. I test every new batch from a new vendor.

42 15Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA, CarlaRPh_TPA and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
anders_CPH
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Feb 2024
Copenhagen, DK
Jul 6, 2024 at 9:43 PM#14
nick_SD_fit said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 3 times from my current compounder. Consistency has been excellent.

Shipping: Next-day with cold pack
Packaging: Professional, discreet, proper labeling with lot/batch numbers
Purity: 97.4% average across orders (Janoshik verified)
Customer service: Responsive within 2 hours
Price: $148/month for semaglutide 2.4mg equivalent

43 16BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros, KetoKyle and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Jul 9, 2024 at 12:02 PM#15

Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful.

Last edited: Jul 9, 2024 at 4:02 PM
44 17PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register