Dr.NutriCornell said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
Dr.NutriCornell said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Coming at Dr.NutriCornell’s question from a different direction. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultsraj_cambridge said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Pushing back on raj_cambridge here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.