stefan_berlin said:

One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.

Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework.

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.

sophie_paris said:

Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

sophie_paris said:

Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.