🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsVendor ReviewsFound a vendor with insanely cheap prices - too good to be true? — need advice Page 6

Found a vendor with insanely cheap prices - too good to be true? — need advice

lisa_labSD Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 2:24 AM 49 replies 2,859 viewsPage 6 of 10
KarenAZ_mom
Member
567
2,567
Aug 2024
Scottsdale, AZ
Oct 5, 2024 at 10:10 PM#26

One thing that is still open after sophie_paris’s answer:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

40 13anna.melb_AU, mark_tokyo, hans_munich and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
fiona_glasgow
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Glasgow, UK
Oct 8, 2024 at 8:45 PM#27
josh_phd_bmore said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.

Last edited: Oct 9, 2024 at 1:45 AM
41 14TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD, JennaRN and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
WendyG_ATL
Member
1,023
5,678
Apr 2024
Georgia
Oct 11, 2024 at 7:19 PM#28
josh_phd_bmore said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.

Last edited: Oct 11, 2024 at 8:19 PM
42 15traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
TrialNerd_Beth
Senior Member
2,345
11,234
Jan 2024
Bethesda, MD
Oct 14, 2024 at 5:51 PM#29
josh_phd_bmore said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

Last edited: Oct 14, 2024 at 9:51 PM
43 16DoseLogDan, SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lisa_labSD
Member
278
1,234
Oct 2024
San Diego, CA
Oct 17, 2024 at 4:21 PM#30

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Follow-up — getting the denial reason in writing was the step that mattered. It named the criterion, and the criterion was a document I already had.

15 13cory_ATX, lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
14567810

Similar Threads

[REVIEW] WWB — 8 months, 6 orders, all Janoshik tested7 replies
[REVIEW] QSC — consistency and pricing, 10+ orders deep5 replies
[REVIEW] GGPeps — 6 orders, all independently tested3 replies
Which vendor should I go with? Side-by-side comparison3 replies
How do you vet a new vendor? My quality checklist9 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register