One thing that is still open after Dr.AddMedPHL’s answer:
How people are distinguishing a supplier having a bad batch from a supplier on the way out?
mike_mod said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
mike_mod said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Agreeing with mike_mod, and the qualification matters more than the agreement. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochemmike_mod said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
That reframing is the part I needed.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.