A1cHero_PHX said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
A1cHero_PHX said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne thing that is still open after A1cHero_PHX’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
stefan_berlin said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.