Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

Following on from labquiet_amy — and this may be the naive question:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

raj_cambridge said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.