MariaRD said:Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
MariaRD said:Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
MariaRD said:Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.
Coming at MariaRD’s question from a different direction. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFollowing on from MariaRD — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
DataDave said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.