LipidDoc_ATL said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Second this. Nothing to add that would improve it.
LipidDoc_ATL said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Coming at LipidDoc_ATL’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after LipidDoc_ATL’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
DataDave said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
I read this differently from DataDave, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.