The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
One thing that is still open after ingrid_STO’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
HPLC_Greg said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
I read this differently from HPLC_Greg, on substance rather than tone. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemHPLC_Greg said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
HPLC_Greg said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
That reframing is the part I needed. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.