Following on from Dr.ReproEndo — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
Admin said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Pushing back on Admin here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
Admin said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdmin said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.