Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

DataDave said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

claudia_zurich said:

The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. No action needed from anybody.