Dr.SurgeonPGH said:

It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.

Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.

hank_denver said:

Worth adding that the tablet is taken daily, so a missed dose costs far less than a missed weekly injection.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

Dr.SurgeonPGH said:

It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.

I read this differently from Dr.SurgeonPGH, on substance rather than tone. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful. Carry on.