JessicaM_2024 said:Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
JessicaM_2024 said:Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from JessicaM_2024 — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
Dr.RaviCardio said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.