From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
andrew_nyc said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Pushing back on andrew_nyc here. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
andrew_nyc said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
No disagreement with andrew_nyc. One condition attached. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochemandrew_nyc said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Taking it to my next appointment.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.