EndoResFellow said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
EndoResFellow said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
EndoResFellow said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
TrialNerd_Beth said:Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.