🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareObstructive sleep apnea improvement on GLP-1 — SURMOUNT-OSA data Page 4

Obstructive sleep apnea improvement on GLP-1 — SURMOUNT-OSA data

SleepDoc_PDX Sat, May 16, 2026 at 8:42 PM 22 replies 712 viewsPage 4 of 5
NurseAsh_DET
Member
356
1,567
Sep 2024
Detroit, MI
May 23, 2026 at 12:23 AM#16
TrialNerd_Beth said:
Month 6 update on sleep apnoea: down 48 lbs from my starting weight of 293 lbs.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

46 19FDA_TrackerJim, ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92 and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TrialTracker_MD
Senior Member
2,345
15,678
Jan 2024
Maryland
May 23, 2026 at 5:58 PM#17

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.

47 20stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LeilaHI
Member
167
789
Jan 2025
Honolulu, HI
May 24, 2026 at 11:32 AM#18
TrialTracker_MD said:
If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.

Same pattern here, and in the same order. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

48 21mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
PharmHunterJen
Member
567
2,345
Jul 2024
Illinois
May 25, 2026 at 5:05 AM#19
TrialTracker_MD said:
If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.

Coming at TrialTracker_MD’s question from a different direction. SURMOUNT-1 landed around 20.9% mean weight loss at 15mg over 72 weeks, against roughly 15% for semaglutide 2.4mg in STEP 1. Different trials, different populations, so the comparison is indicative rather than decisive — but SURPASS-2 was a genuine head-to-head and it pointed the same way.

Happy to go further on any of that.

Last edited: May 25, 2026 at 11:05 AM
49 22Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep, NicoleRaleigh and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
May 25, 2026 at 10:39 PM#20

Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.

Last edited: May 26, 2026 at 2:39 AM
21 19PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register