Following on from carl_compliance — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Following on from carl_compliance — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Dr.SportsMedIN said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Pushing back on Dr.SportsMedIN here. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
Dr.SportsMedIN said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDr.SportsMedIN said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Taking it to my next appointment.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.