🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesEchocardiographic changes on GLP-1 — LV mass and diastolic function Page 2

Echocardiographic changes on GLP-1 — LV mass and diastolic function

Dr.CardioMD Sat, May 30, 2026 at 6:58 AM 20 replies 460 viewsPage 2 of 4
bri_stats
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Seattle, WA
May 30, 2026 at 10:28 PM#6
Dr.CardioMD said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…
Dr.CardioMD said:
...we don't know the long-term effects of cardiovascular risk...

This is a fair point, and I think intellectual honesty requires acknowledging it. GLP-1 agonists in their current form have ~8-10 years of human exposure data. That's not nothing, but it's not 30+ years either.

However: the risk-benefit calculation should also consider the KNOWN long-term effects of untreated obesity — diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, joint destruction, reduced lifespan by 5-10 years.

Uncertainty about GLP-1 long-term safety vs certainty about obesity consequences. The calculus seems clear to me, but reasonable people can disagree.

37 7sarah_nash92, FitDadDave, RunnerRach and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JakeSmashed95
Member
412
1,890
Aug 2024
Arkansas
Online
May 31, 2026 at 4:37 AM#7

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

36 6kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LindaRN_retired
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Sarasota, FL
May 31, 2026 at 10:45 AM#8
bri_stats said:
Dr.CardioMD said: ...we don't know the long-term effects of cardiovascular risk...

SUSTAIN-6 was the first CVOT to show cardiovascular benefit with semaglutide, relevant to cardiovascular risk. In 3,297 T2DM patients with high CV risk: MACE HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.95, p=0.02)[1].

Notable: the retinopathy signal in SUSTAIN-6 (HR 1.76) was subsequently attributed to rapid A1C reduction in patients with pre-existing retinopathy — not a direct drug effect. This has been confirmed in longer-term follow-up studies.

References:
[1] Marso SP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834-1844.
Last edited: May 31, 2026 at 1:45 PM
35 5amsterdam_pete, LondonLisa, mike_nyc and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
Dr.CardioMD
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Cleveland, OH
May 31, 2026 at 4:53 PM#9
bri_stats said:
Dr.CardioMD said: ...we don't know the long-term effects of cardiovascular risk...

Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of GLP-1 agonists and cardiovascular risk: beyond weight loss, GLP-1R activation directly suppresses NF-κB signaling, reduces NLRP3 inflammasome activation, and decreases monocyte/macrophage adhesion to endothelium[1].

Clinical correlates: hsCRP reduction of 30-60% (consistently seen across trials), reduced carotid intima-media thickness, and decreased coronary plaque inflammation on PET imaging.

These anti-inflammatory effects likely contribute to the cardiovascular benefit seen in SELECT — and may explain benefits beyond what weight loss alone would predict.

References:
[1] Hogan AE, et al. Diabetologia. 2014;57(4):781-784.
34 4roxy_nash, tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
steph_laguna
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Laguna Beach, CA
Jun 1, 2026 at 10:20 PM#10
LindaRN_retired said:
SUSTAIN-6 was the first CVOT to show cardiovascular benefit with semaglutide, relevant to cardiovascular risk.

I'm 62 years old and want to share my perspective on cardiovascular risk as an older member of this community.

My doctor was initially hesitant because of my age, but the SELECT trial included patients up to 72 and showed consistent benefit across age groups. We started at the lowest dose with closer monitoring.

9 months later: down 46 lbs, off atorvastatin, A1C from 7.2% to 5.5%. My cardiologist is thrilled. cardiovascular risk is absolutely relevant for older adults — don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

24 24marco_milano, pam_columbus, nick_SD_fit and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register