InsuranceTom said:Albumin binding above 99% is the whole reason weekly dosing works, and it is also why the trough matters more than the peak.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.
InsuranceTom said:Albumin binding above 99% is the whole reason weekly dosing works, and it is also why the trough matters more than the peak.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.
InsuranceTom said:Albumin binding above 99% is the whole reason weekly dosing works, and it is also why the trough matters more than the peak.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after InsuranceTom’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
stefan_berlin said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.