🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareSemaglutide and gallbladder disease risk — my results so far Page 8

Semaglutide and gallbladder disease risk — my results so far

lisa_labSD Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 10:48 PM 44 replies 2,339 viewsPage 8 of 9
MikeNYC_runner
Member
378
1,678
Jul 2024
New York, NY
Jan 16, 2026 at 12:05 AM#36
Dr.RaviCardio said:
Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then…

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Albumin binding above 99% is the whole reason weekly dosing works, and it is also why the trough matters more than the peak. People who dose late are not losing a peak, they are letting the trough fall, and the appetite effect tracks the trough.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

21 19PedsEndoPhilly, SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
stefan_berlin
Member
234
1,123
Oct 2024
Berlin, DE
Jan 28, 2026 at 7:16 PM#37

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.

Last edited: Jan 28, 2026 at 10:16 PM
22 20JessicaH_TX, KevinCompounds, TirzTom and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.MetabolicMD
VIP Member
2,345
16,789
Jan 2024
Rochester, MN
Feb 10, 2026 at 2:20 PM#38

One thing that is still open after Dr.RaviCardio’s answer:

What the dose-response curve actually looks like above 1.7mg, because the trial means hide how few people account for the extra loss?

23 21HealthEcon_DC, PedsEndoPhilly, SleepDoc_PDX and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
GenomicsKate
Member
345
1,890
Oct 2024
Cambridge, MA
Feb 23, 2026 at 9:17 AM#39
stefan_berlin said:
Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

Pushing back on stefan_berlin here. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

24 22Dr.PeteFamMed, claudia_zurich, nancy_portland and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
marco_milano
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Milan, IT
Mar 8, 2026 at 4:06 AM#40
stefan_berlin said:
Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.

46 19emma_london, tammy_FL, Dr.LipidDallas and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register