🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesHeart rate increase on GLP-1 — looking for input Page 5

Heart rate increase on GLP-1 — looking for input

LeilaHI Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 3:14 AM 28 replies 1,322 viewsPage 5 of 6
pam_stl
Member
267
1,123
Oct 2024
St. Louis, MO
Apr 13, 2026 at 10:55 AM#21
Dr.PathRoch said:
PharmacoVig_BOS said: ...cardiovascular risk is just another fad...

6 month update on cardiovascular risk: down 50 lbs, off blood pressure meds, A1C normalized. Genuinely life-changing.

Last edited: Apr 13, 2026 at 3:55 PM
15 13Dr.ObesityMed, HealthEcon_DC, PedsEndoPhilly and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmacoVig_BOS
Senior Member
1,567
8,901
Feb 2024
Boston, MA
Apr 19, 2026 at 2:23 AM#22
Dr.PathRoch said:
PharmacoVig_BOS said: ...cardiovascular risk is just another fad...
Dr.PathRoch said:
...we're creating a generation dependent on cardiovascular risk...

I understand the concern, but consider this analogy: are we "creating a generation dependent on" blood pressure medication? Cholesterol medication? Thyroid medication?

Obesity is a chronic disease with biological drivers. Treating it with medication is no different from treating any other chronic condition. The "dependency" framing implies weakness or moral failure — neither of which is accurate.

If ongoing medication is what keeps someone healthy, that's successful treatment, not dependency.

Last edited: Apr 19, 2026 at 5:23 AM
16 14Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete, LondonLisa and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
Apr 24, 2026 at 5:47 PM#23
Dr.PathRoch said:
PharmacoVig_BOS said: ...cardiovascular risk is just another fad...

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.

17 15julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
hyun_seoul
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Seoul, KR
Apr 30, 2026 at 9:08 AM#24

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

NNT calculation for cardiovascular risk clinical endpoints: NNT = 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction).

From SELECT trial: MACE at 39 months — 6.5% semaglutide vs 8.0% placebo. ARR = 1.5%. NNT = 67 over 3.3 years.

Compare to established therapies:

InterventionNNTTimeframe
Semaglutide (MACE)673.3 years
Statins primary prevention (MI)~1005 years
Aspirin secondary prevention~772 years

These NNTs are clinically meaningful and comparable to accepted cardiovascular interventions.

Last edited: Apr 30, 2026 at 1:08 PM
18 16BariatricNurseD, MASHdoc_SA, GenomicsKate and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
jason_sac26
New Member
34
123
Jan 2026
Sacramento, CA
May 6, 2026 at 12:26 AM#25
hyun_seoul said:
NNT calculation for cardiovascular risk clinical endpoints: NNT = 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction).

Second this.

Last edited: May 6, 2026 at 2:26 AM
19 17Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register