DoseLogDan said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
DoseLogDan said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsEndoResFellow said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
EndoResFellow said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.
Worth separating that from tirzepatide, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.