One concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
One thing that is still open after EndoResFellow’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
Dr.AddMedPHL said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Pushing back on Dr.AddMedPHL here. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.AddMedPHL said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Dr.AddMedPHL said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.