denise_HTX said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
denise_HTX said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
denise_HTX said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.
denise_HTX said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.
Dr.Martinez said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.