🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesGLP-1 and arterial inflammation — what worked for you?

GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — what worked for you?

PeptideSynthNJ Mon, May 26, 2025 at 3:55 AM 14 replies 1,510 viewsPage 1 of 3
This thread is more than 12 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
PeptideSynthNJ
Member
234
1,234
Aug 2024
Princeton, NJ
May 26, 2025 at 3:55 AM#1

Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

Relative versus absolute is the distinction that gets lost: a 20% relative reduction on a high baseline risk is a large absolute benefit, and the same relative figure on a low baseline risk is a small one.

The question I want answered is how much of the SELECT benefit is plausibly independent of the weight loss, and whether that distinction changes anything practical.

I have searched first, so if this is covered somewhere point me at it and I will read it.

45 23wanda_boise, NurseAsh_DET, BenResearch_OR and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SleepRoch
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Rochester, MN
May 26, 2025 at 4:34 AM#2
PeptideSynthNJ said:
Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

Continuous metabolic monitoring dashboard for cardiovascular risk — I track everything in a spreadsheet and here's the month-over-month trend for my key markers:

Weight: consistent downtrend, -2.3 lbs/week average
Fasting glucose (finger stick): stable at 82 mg/dL
Blood pressure (home): 118/72 average
Resting heart rate: 62 bpm (down from 78)
Waist circumference: down 12 inches total

The resting heart rate improvement correlates with cardiovascular fitness gains. Everything is moving in the right direction.

46 24kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
stefan_berlin
Member
234
1,123
Oct 2024
Berlin, DE
May 26, 2025 at 5:13 AM#3
Dr.SleepRoch said:
Continuous metabolic monitoring dashboard for cardiovascular risk — I track everything in a spreadsheet and here's the month-over-month trend for my…

SUSTAIN-6 was the first CVOT to show cardiovascular benefit with semaglutide, relevant to cardiovascular risk. In 3,297 T2DM patients with high CV risk: MACE HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.95, p=0.02)[1].

Notable: the retinopathy signal in SUSTAIN-6 (HR 1.76) was subsequently attributed to rapid A1C reduction in patients with pre-existing retinopathy — not a direct drug effect. This has been confirmed in longer-term follow-up studies.

References:
[1] Marso SP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834-1844.
47 0KevinCompounds, TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
WendyG_ATL
Member
1,023
5,678
Apr 2024
Georgia
May 26, 2025 at 5:52 AM#4
PeptideSynthNJ said:
Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

48 1AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
VendorMark
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Texas
Online
May 26, 2025 at 9:32 AM#5

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

PeptideSynthNJ said:
...cardiovascular risk is just another fad...

I understand the skepticism — we've all seen "miracle" weight loss solutions come and go. But consider what makes GLP-1 agonists different:

  • Phase 3 RCTs with thousands of participants (not 20-person pilot studies)
  • Published in NEJM, JAMA, Lancet (not press releases)
  • Replicated across multiple independent research groups
  • Proven cardiovascular and renal benefits beyond weight loss
  • Biological mechanism fully characterized at the receptor level

This isn't a fad — it's a new drug class supported by the highest level of clinical evidence. The comparison to past fads is understandable but inappropriate.

49 2claudia_zurich, nancy_portland, rick_sfbay and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register