Dr.PathRoch said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Dr.PathRoch said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemDr.SleepRoch said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Second this. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Closing this out: the trough rather than the peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.