NauseaFreeNow said:

Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Posting only so the count is not one.

NauseaFreeNow said:

Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.

One concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

One thing that is still open after NauseaFreeNow’s answer:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

labquiet_amy said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.