🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesMy blood pressure normalization journey — what worked for you? Page 2

My blood pressure normalization journey — what worked for you?

tane_welly Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 7:34 PM 13 replies 1,917 viewsPage 2 of 3
Dr.KarenChen
VIP Member
4,210
24,567
Nov 2023
San Francisco, CA
Dec 7, 2024 at 7:59 AM#6
DanielChem_CHI said:
Vitamin deficiency cascade with cardiovascular risk: after 6+ months of reduced food intake, I developed a subtle but important pattern: low B12 →…

Pushing back on DanielChem_CHI here. The "earlier than weight loss explains" argument is weaker than this thread makes it sound. Blood pressure and inflammatory markers move fast and are downstream of early weight loss, so the mechanism is not as cleanly separable as the summaries imply.

28 6julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NateNeph
VIP Member
2,987
16,234
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
Dec 7, 2024 at 10:33 PM#7
tane_welly said:
Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

I'm 58 years old and want to share my perspective on cardiovascular risk as an older member of this community.

My doctor was initially hesitant because of my age, but the SELECT trial included patients up to 72 and showed consistent benefit across age groups. We started at the lowest dose with closer monitoring.

11 months later: down 58 lbs, off atorvastatin, A1C from 7.6% to 5.5%. My cardiologist is thrilled. cardiovascular risk is absolutely relevant for older adults — don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

Last edited: Dec 8, 2024 at 12:33 AM
29 7NauseaFreeNow, SteveThurs, B12Beth and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PulmRoch
Member
456
2,345
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Dec 8, 2024 at 1:07 PM#8
Dr.KarenChen said:
The "earlier than weight loss explains" argument is weaker than this thread makes it sound.

I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

The SELECT trial demonstrated a 20% reduction in MACE with semaglutide 2.4mg[1]. This is practice-changing because the CV benefit appears to be independent of the degree of weight loss — suggesting direct vascular and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.

For cardiovascular risk, this means we need to think beyond the primary outcome and consider the cardiovascular implications. The all-cause mortality reduction (HR 0.81) is the most clinically meaningful signal.

References:
[1] Lincoff AM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221-2232.
Last edited: Dec 8, 2024 at 2:07 PM
30 8AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
KristenIndy
Member
623
2,678
May 2024
Indianapolis, IN
Dec 9, 2024 at 3:42 AM#9

Following on from PharmD_Rodriguez — and this may be the naive question:

How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?

31 9DataDave, Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tane_welly
Member
234
1,123
Sep 2024
Wellington, NZ
Dec 12, 2024 at 1:41 AM#10
Dr.PulmRoch said:
I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

SUSTAIN-6 was the first CVOT to show cardiovascular benefit with semaglutide, relevant to cardiovascular risk. In 3,297 T2DM patients with high CV risk: MACE HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.95, p=0.02)[1].

Notable: the retinopathy signal in SUSTAIN-6 (HR 1.76) was subsequently attributed to rapid A1C reduction in patients with pre-existing retinopathy — not a direct drug effect. This has been confirmed in longer-term follow-up studies.

References:
[1] Marso SP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834-1844.
Last edited: Dec 12, 2024 at 4:41 AM
1 24pam_columbus
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register