Dr.SportsMedIN said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
AmyNC_wife said:The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.
Dr.SportsMedIN said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.