🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsLab Results & BiomarkersThyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — 6 month update

Thyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — 6 month update

DataDave Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 8:25 PM 13 replies 1,017 viewsPage 1 of 3
This thread is more than 6 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Dec 8, 2025 at 8:25 PM#1

My prescriber wanted a baseline TSH and did not want a calcitonin, and I would like to understand the reasoning rather than just accepting it.

The narrow version of the question is why calcitonin screening is not recommended when the label carries a thyroid warning, because those two facts look contradictory from the outside.

I have searched first, so if this is covered somewhere point me at it and I will read it.

50 20VendorMark, COA_Karl, MikeFit_NJ and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DanielChem_CHI
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
Mar 2024
Chicago, IL
Dec 8, 2025 at 10:14 PM#2
DataDave said:
My prescriber wanted a baseline TSH and did not want a calcitonin, and I would like to understand the reasoning rather than just accepting it.

Thyroid cancer screening labs for thyroid monitoring — addressing the boxed warning concern with actual data:

Calcitonin level: 2.0 pg/mL (normal <10). Checked at baseline, month 6, and month 12. Rock stable, no upward trend.

Thyroid ultrasound: normal, no nodules at month 12.

The MTC risk from rodent studies has not been confirmed in human post-marketing data across millions of patient-years. The boxed warning is a regulatory precaution based on animal data. While monitoring is prudent, the clinical risk appears to be negligible.

49 19Dr.DermMIA, fiona_VT, denise_HTX and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PainCLE
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Cleveland, OH
Dec 9, 2025 at 12:03 AM#3
DanielChem_CHI said:
Thyroid cancer screening labs for thyroid monitoring — addressing the boxed warning concern with actual data: Calcitonin level: 2.0 pg/mL (normal…

Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.

48 18oliver_london, tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
SkepticalSean
Member
98
345
Jan 2025
Maine
Dec 9, 2025 at 1:52 AM#4
DataDave said:
My prescriber wanted a baseline TSH and did not want a calcitonin, and I would like to understand the reasoning rather than just accepting it.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.

47 17tammy_FL, Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
james_edin
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Edinburgh, UK
Dec 9, 2025 at 12:33 PM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.

46 16bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london, tane_welly and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Optimal lab testing frequency on GLP-1 — evidence-based schedule5 replies
A1C from 7.2 to 5.1 — my bloodwork transformation19 replies
Thyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — TSH and free T4 trends3 replies
Lipid panel improvements mega-thread — share your numbers19 replies
Liver enzymes trending down on GLP-1 — ALT/AST normalization17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register