Dr.RenalNash said:

It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

Pushing back on Dr.RenalNash here. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.

One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.

julia.endo said:

The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.

Coming at julia.endo’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

Closing the loop on my own question.

Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.