SleepDoc_PDX said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
PedsEndoPhilly said:Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.
SleepDoc_PDX said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
I read this differently from SleepDoc_PDX, on substance rather than tone. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.