Dr.NateNeph said:

Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…

Mine went the same way, slower. Nothing to add that would improve it.

VendorMark said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.

VendorMark said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.