Dr.ObesityLA said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Second this. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Dr.ObesityLA said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Coming at Dr.ObesityLA’s question from a different direction. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from Dr.ObesityLA — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
FDA_TrackerJim said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.