Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
emma_london said:Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Pushing back on Dr.LeslieOBGYN here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.