From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.
Dec 8, 2024 at 9:48 PM#16
44 17DataDave, Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 9, 2024 at 2:58 AM#17
Following on from kate.chem — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Last edited: Dec 9, 2024 at 7:58 AM
45 18KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint, Dr.PeteFamMed and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 9, 2024 at 8:07 AM#18
LindaRN_retired said:Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…
Pushing back on LindaRN_retired here. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
46 19SallyK_inj, CryptoCarl, MariaRD and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDec 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM#19
LindaRN_retired said:Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
47 20sarah_nash92, FitDadDave, RunnerRach and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report