PharmD_Rodriguez said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. No action needed from anybody.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after PharmD_Rodriguez’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
mona_PHX said:There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.