roxy_nash said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Pushing back on roxy_nash here. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
roxy_nash said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
roxy_nash said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Taking it to my next appointment.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
Dr.ObesityMed said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.