SandraNC_45 said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Second this.
SandraNC_45 said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Second this.
SandraNC_45 said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. HbA1c reflects roughly three months of average glycaemia weighted toward the most recent weeks, which is why repeating it at six weeks tells you very little. The improvement on this class comes from two directions — direct glucose-dependent insulin secretion and glucagon suppression, plus the indirect effect of weight loss on insulin sensitivity — and the second continues after the first has plateaued.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne thing that is still open after SandraNC_45’s answer:
Why A1C lags the way it does, and what to look at in the meantime if you want to know sooner?
wendy_avl said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.