🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionReturn to running after weight loss — need advice

Return to running after weight loss — need advice

NurseKim_ATL Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 2:53 AM 13 replies 1,882 viewsPage 1 of 3
This thread is more than 21 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
NurseKim_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Aug 30, 2024 at 2:53 AM#1

I lifted three times a week throughout and still lost lean mass. Not as much as I expected to, but the idea that training prevents it entirely is not what my scan says.

The question I want answered is whether resistance training and protein change the ratio or only the absolute amount.

Happy to be told the question itself is wrong.

11 6denise_HTX, raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.LipidDallas
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Dallas, TX
Aug 30, 2024 at 4:19 AM#2

Taking the question as asked, rather than the general version of it. The intervention that works is boring and well evidenced: resistance training two to three times a week at a genuine effort, protein at 1.4 to 2.0 g/kg of reference body weight, and not making the deficit larger than the training can support. Cardio does not protect lean mass and in a deep deficit competes with recovery.

10 5wei_SG, cory_ATX, lori_vegas and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DoseLogDan
Member
201
567
Feb 2025
Montana
Aug 30, 2024 at 5:45 AM#3
Dr.LipidDallas said:
The intervention that works is boring and well evidenced: resistance training two to three times a week at a genuine effort, protein at 1.4 to 2.0…

Right, and protein targets should be set on a reference weight rather than current weight. Setting 1.6 g/kg on a starting weight of 130kg produces a target nobody hits on a suppressed appetite.

Last edited: Aug 30, 2024 at 6:45 AM
9 4mel_PDX, Dr.AddMedPHL, newstart_MO and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
MeganSA_TX
Member
634
2,890
Jun 2024
San Antonio, TX
Aug 30, 2024 at 7:11 AM#4
NurseKim_ATL said:
I lifted three times a week throughout and still lost lean mass.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. The honest range is roughly 20 to 40% of total loss as lean mass without deliberate resistance training, and roughly 10 to 20% with it plus adequate protein. Both numbers need a caveat that matters: "lean mass" on a DEXA is not muscle. It includes water, glycogen and the lean fraction of organs, and glycogen alone carries about three grams of water per gram. A large early lean drop is mostly the glycogen and water going, which is why the first scan flatters and the second is the honest one.

8 3TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BariatricNurseD
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Dallas, TX
Online
Aug 30, 2024 at 3:30 PM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

Muscle fiber type changes during GLP-1-mediated weight loss, relevant to lean mass: preliminary biopsy data suggests that weight loss shifts the skeletal muscle fiber type distribution:

  • Decreased Type IIx (glycolytic, fast-twitch) fibers
  • Increased Type I (oxidative, slow-twitch) fibers
  • Improved mitochondrial density and function
  • Enhanced insulin-stimulated glucose uptake per fiber

This "metabolic remodeling" of muscle may contribute to improved insulin sensitivity independent of total lean mass changes. The muscle you keep becomes metabolically better, even if there's less of it[1].

References:
[1] Pirkmajer S, et al. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1123456.
Last edited: Aug 30, 2024 at 8:30 PM
7 2Dr.EndoIndy, tom_AK, josh_phd_bmore and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review11 replies
DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register