PharmHunterJen said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.
quinn_sf said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
quinn_sf said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsquinn_sf said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.