Following on from LibrarianMeg — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
SteveThurs said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
SteveThurs said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsSteveThurs said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Taking it to my next appointment.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.