🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingEndotoxin testing methods — what worked for you? Page 4

Endotoxin testing methods — what worked for you?

mona_PHX Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 3:18 AM 29 replies 1,900 viewsPage 4 of 6
andrew_nyc
Member
534
2,345
Apr 2024
New York, NY
Jul 16, 2025 at 2:21 AM#16
roxy_nash said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.

Last edited: Jul 16, 2025 at 7:21 AM
3 1Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph, PharmD_Rodriguez
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmacoVig_BOS
Senior Member
1,567
8,901
Feb 2024
Boston, MA
Jul 17, 2025 at 7:48 PM#17
SleepDoc_PDX said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 97.3% purity.

COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis:

  • No HPLC data: If there's no chromatography graph, it's not a real COA
  • Exact 100% purity: Suspicious — real testing always shows slight variation
  • No batch number: Can't trace back to specific production
  • No endotoxin testing: For injectables, this is essential
  • Template looks like it was made in Word: Professional labs have standardized formats

I have seen fake COAs that are literally photoshopped. Always verify independently if possible.

4 2Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete, LondonLisa and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
FDA_TrackerJim
Senior Member
1,567
7,890
Feb 2024
Rockville, MD
Jul 19, 2025 at 1:14 PM#18

One thing that is still open after SleepDoc_PDX’s answer:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

5 3MikeNYC_runner and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.GutHealth
Senior Member
1,456
7,890
Mar 2024
Minnesota
Jul 21, 2025 at 6:39 AM#19
PharmacoVig_BOS said:
COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis: No HPLC data: If there's no…

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.4% purity, 0.0% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

6 4Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Jul 23, 2025 at 12:03 AM#20

Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source.

28 1PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register