🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingInter-lab variability in peptide testing — July 2024 Page 4

Inter-lab variability in peptide testing — July 2024

PedsEndoPhilly Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 9:32 PM 52 replies 2,419 viewsPage 4 of 11
PharmHunterJen
Member
567
2,345
Jul 2024
Illinois
Feb 5, 2025 at 3:33 PM#16

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$142, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$212
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$112

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

37 10Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_nyc
VIP Member
5,678
21,345
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Feb 6, 2025 at 7:05 AM#17
LabKate said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

That reframing is the part I needed. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

Last edited: Feb 6, 2025 at 11:05 AM
38 11stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.Martinez
Medical Advisor
3,891
28,456
Nov 2023
Boston, MA
Online
Feb 6, 2025 at 10:36 PM#18

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.6% purity, 0.2% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

39 12rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
claudia_zurich
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Zurich, CH
Feb 7, 2025 at 2:07 PM#19
Dr.Martinez said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.

Last edited: Feb 7, 2025 at 8:07 PM
40 13alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Feb 8, 2025 at 5:38 AM#20

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out.

12 10PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register