May 3, 2025 at 8:41 AM#21
One thing that is still open after VendorMark’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
50 23amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
May 5, 2025 at 11:53 AM#22
Dr.PainCLE said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
I read this differently from Dr.PainCLE, on substance rather than tone. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Last edited: May 5, 2025 at 12:53 PM
1 24PeptideSynthNJ
Reply Quote Save Share Report
May 7, 2025 at 3:04 PM#23
Dr.PainCLE said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
Last edited: May 7, 2025 at 5:04 PM
2 0JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsMay 9, 2025 at 6:13 PM#24
Dr.PainCLE said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.
3 1wanda_boise, NurseAsh_DET, BenResearch_OR
Reply Quote Save Share Report
May 11, 2025 at 9:21 PM#25
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
4 2emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report